Ten straight answers on which public pages KEK checks, what the one-page verdict contains and what KEK will never promise.
KEK can propose a separate review when the issue involves more sources or more people. Examples include several markets, a sensitive leadership claim, a regulated topic or wording that a partner must approve. The brief will show what KEK observed, what remains uncertain and what needs leadership, legal, regulatory or partner review. It is not legal advice or approval to publish.
First, KEK confirms the question, the people you want to reach and the public sources to review. Next, a person reviews those sources. You then receive a short document with examples, comments and changes to consider. Items needing more evidence or approval are clearly marked. You decide what to use, ignore or discuss further.
KEK first checks how many pages, audiences and markets are involved, then confirms the delivery date. A review of one website for one audience is kept small. Several markets, regulated claims, translations or several internal approvers require a separate scope.
No. Send the company name, website and the question you want answered. Also name the people you care about, such as potential customers, partners, journalists, candidates or investors. KEK then agrees which public pages and search examples to review.
The first check uses public information agreed with you, such as website pages, search results, published media, public social posts or public partner announcements. Do not put customer names, personal information, confidential plans or commercial terms into the request form. Non-public material requires a separate agreement.
It is for people responsible for how a company is understood in public. That could be a founder preparing a launch, a marketing lead entering a new market, a communications team updating a leadership profile or a corporate-affairs lead reviewing a partner announcement.
The check does not promise a higher Google position, an AI recommendation, more traffic, leads or sales. It shows what the selected public pages say today, which named facts or published examples are missing, and which claims should be kept, rewritten or removed.
No. A technical SEO audit checks matters such as site structure, indexing, links and page performance. This check asks whether the public pages clearly explain the company and offer, then name the markets, customers, projects, credentials or published examples needed to support their claims. It is not a rank tracker or an AI-monitoring service.
You get a one-page verdict showing each claim, the pages KEK checked, the facts and examples KEK found, what is missing and the next move: keep it, rewrite it or hold it. For example, if a page says “regional leader” but names no markets, case studies, client quotes or published partner announcements, KEK will list those missing evidence types and propose a factual rewrite. A reviewer may use 1 to 5 labels to make the gaps easy to compare. These labels guide discussion; they do not predict results.
KEK looks at a small, agreed set of public information, such as your homepage, About page, a Google result and a recent media mention. We ask whether a potential customer, partner, journalist, job candidate or investor can quickly understand what you do and see evidence that supports the story. A person reviews the findings. It is not continuous monitoring or a complete audit of search or AI systems.